I´ve typically not formed communal bonds or personal relationships with teachers.
awe spoke in our previous post about Brown Fascists and Red Fascists. lest not forget Black Fascists. what´s the difference? Brown Fascists are Nazi or nazi-like. which means that they are like Mussolini´s but that they have more focus on their idea of ‘race’ & their Germanicism, the brown, the soil, of “Germania”, and the wooden “viking” craft. the overlapping coincidence is, that the Brown Fascists were the first to employ modern camouflage, which happened to be in the famous green and brown colours. later militarists of all sorts, around the globe, adopted that combo of colors.
Black Fascists is a well-known phenomena. they are seen in Italy and in Britain, before WW2 especially, and can be described as Nazism minus Germanicism, or even minus race.
Red Fascists are Leninists and other Socialists, so far as they want to deploy violence, which includes, obviously, Maoists, et al.
Strangely enough (to some), people that advocate for immigrant attack-against-inhabitants violence are thus Fascists; which does not come as a surprise if one looks at the phenomenon of Third-Worldism
You belong in this in-box, slut-mom.
Do not worry about being a slut. All women, and men, are to different degrees sluts. cf. Dutch slodder: ‘a careless man’. English slut 15c: ‘woman of loose character’ or ‘a bold hussy.’
It is not necessarily incorrect to “label” you an “Esoteric” Hitlerist; as you have, according to documented knowledge, participated in such groups and workings. You may not worship Hitler, — although, actually I think you have done so in the past, at least, — but, in any case you have devoted much of your life to the admiration of a man (M. Serrano) who does [or, if you, like a Prole of the Soul, prefer, “did”] worship Adolf Hitler. So, as to label, because that is what a thinking mind does: you may at least be correctly labeled as ‘a person who admires an Esoteric Hitlerist.’ You are also recently documented as being an irrational anti-Semite.
That you appear to me as ashamed of that, or as denying it, is to me a testament of your psychology.
That was not the point any way, which you sidestepped with either your lack of discernment or your sloppy rhetoric. I will humiliate myself, and re-petition it.
This is not about me individually, as what I work with are ideins already relayed by Philosophers preceding me.
You were correct about: hyper-criticality. But then again you you don´t know what Criticism really means and is for. If you knew it, you would grow. I challenge people to see what their ‘core-persona’ is; or what they revert to. If you knew it, you would grow, or at least not try to count it as a character flaw (it is a strength).
What you say about what you refer to with the term “feminine side”, referring to me, is something already dealt with by people far superior in intellect than yourself; describing what I describe before we were even born. I don´t blame women even. Firstly, blame is a low virtus. Secondly, women are not to blame. My views on this are the same as of any real Patriarchy in history. Which traded women as the baby-producing property that they are in this world, and were also in the West, until very recently. This being of of women is now virtually disputed because of an an ephemeral trend called Feminism. Simply, a heresy that will be put down, as it has been put down before. Simply this irreligion, the irreligion of viewing the woman as something other than a baby-producing copy-of-the-man-for-motherhood, is what is slowly, but surely, killing the Jewish & Aryan, or previously-Aryan West, but also e.g. Japan.
I will treat you rudely if you behave like that we “have equal abilities”, that we have “the same abilities”, or any such brute egalitarianism. I will keep a pathos of distance.
You try to paint this as only Arabs, but I literally have the ocean of 5.000 years of writing to shew otherwise: that this is also how both Jewish and Aryan peoples have done this for all of history. E.g. the women of a certain Gothic tribe had to hang themselves after the husband had died1, while in India they were burnt.2 I would probably not go so far.
He claims that the Herules also practiced a form of senicide, having a non-relative kill the sick and elderly and burning the remains on a wood pyre. Following the death of their husbands, Herul women were expected to commit suicide by hanging. With the ascent of Justinian, Procopius says that the Herules within the empire converted to Christianity and “adopted a gentler manner of life.”
This is not merely Arabs, nor did I state that I admire them, as you strawmanned me as doing.
I stated that I ‘almost’ envy them, and that is for having a functioning and expanding culture — apparently somewhat replacing Aryan or Western culture — because of the Arabs being a Patriarchy.
A car is based on explosions. Fire is what makes it go. Thaumaturgically, it should be loud and hot. But we can put a radiator and a muffler on it, and it’s not that bad, unless it’s been sitting in direct sunlight.
Demotism is based on envy. Thing about envy is you can’t have it flopping around untethered. Have to have a target. Hence, market dominant minorities. Kulaks, Jews. Or, in the proggie’s case, market dominant majorities. Not merely handy, but vital. Envy is what makes it go, but there’s no such thing as a sociological muffler.
Marx tried to do it with classes. If you have racially pure nations, you work with what you got. Classes aren’t really that unmistakeable, though, so it’s not great. Further, immigrants always have a strong vote bias, so the party they vote for always wants to import them. Skin colour: now you’re cooking with gas.
Even if proggies manage to prison-camp every white, inevitably they will want to import someone of a different shade of brown. They will try to exploit the envy of the original shade of brown, and the cycle will repeat. As always, as politics approaches communism, citizens must approach equal. The envotaic force must be allowed to do work. However, we are all equal if and only if we are all dead.
Arabs & other types of brown people, or Muslims or Muslim derived.
from Nick Land´s Xenosystems.net
A topical Churchill quote (and probably his greatest remark):
… every time we have to decide between Europe and the open sea, it is always the open sea we shall choose.
Such a Britain would not only be worth something, it would be worth everything. (But it’s gone.)
A relevant Sailer comment:
In the American mind, land powers are seen as militarist, brooding, and no fun: Sparta, Prussia, the Soviet Union, and now Putin’s Russia. In contrast, sea powers are the good guys, the cool kids: Athens, Holland, England, and America. […] With natural defenses and a high-tech military, sea powers generally didn’t need enormous conscript armies, martial discipline, and centralized economic control. Instead, sea power was conducive to liberty at home and adventure capitalism abroad. [There’s an additional ‘adventure capitalism’ link, which freaked out my antivirus program.]
… and a Dugin recollection.
Posted on June 20th, 2016 at 3:10 pm