In general, it seems that true civilizations develop once Aryan, nomadic, “solar”, patriarchal, egalitarian, creative races meet with local, Chtonic, “lunar”, matriarchal, hierarchical races, as it did in India (with the local Dravidian element), in Europe (with the native Alpine and Etruscan elements) and even in China (with the Tocharians “fertilizing” the Chinese culture, brining them the horse and other innovations).

The Aryans have a high sense of organization, morality and of the rule of law, while the Chtonic races have more intuition, art of living and more connection to the earthy, practical side of life. Neither of the two types of races is perfect in itself. It is when they meet that we see brilliant civilizations appearing, it seems.

We notice for instance that when a culture is purely Aryan, there are no sculptures, sophisticated temples, big cities, etc. Only war and commercial trade (the British in the Modern Age are an example of this). The Aryan does not bother with embellishing his surrounding and settings things in stone. He’s always on the move.

When a culture is purely Chtonic on the other hand, then the whole society is based on social status, hierarchy, nepotism and there is little curiosity to expand one’s horizons, to learn from others or to evolve in any way (that’s how most of the world is). There is little space nor incentive for the development of new technologies. People live off the land, or steal from each other (as in the deserts of the Middle East).

When the Aryan element in a civilization gets diluted and fades away, the culture becomes stales and degenerates. Depending on the quality of the racial mixture, it can preserve itself in immobility virtually forever (like China) or it can decay into oblivion under the pressure of inferior blood (like the civilizations of the Middle East did).

The Sumerian, Assyrians, Persians, etc were at least partially Aryan, as per their language, their gods and social structure. Then they got overwhelmed by Semitic/Negroid blood (what we today call “Arab”) and disappeared.

Usually, their remaining Aryan elites moved out and immigrated into the next remaining civilization and bring with them their technical and spiritual knowledge (Babylonian elites moved into Egypt, then when Egypt was sinking, their elites moved into Greece, when Greece sank, their elites moved into Rome, etc.).

China also developed into a civilization once the seed of civilization was planted by small numbers of Aryan pioneers (Tocharians and others). And then they were smart enough to retain most of the useful things over the next thousands of years.

A modern day example of these phenomenon would be places like Hong Kong, Singapore or Taiwan, where once Aryan law (British Common Law) is implemented among a Chtonic race of good blood (ethnic Chinese) along with a tiny elite of Aryan managers/rulers/advisors, then that particular places flourishes. If you’d remove the Aryan element and Aryan laws, those places would in a few decades return to typical Chinese nepotism, corruption and top-down, hierarchical forms of organization.

▬▬▬ by Ahnenerbe @


(N) G. Eiríksson Says: Your comment is awaiting moderation.

As the self-reported Christians banally make fun of Mr. Land here, and by that act not imtating lord Jesus, I see that they advocate Distributionism.

Let´s be real. There´s never been a free as in fair market. Look at J.P. Morgan´s tricks, or that of any ‘robber baron’. Organized crime ruining organized labour or beating it. The Anglo-Semitic Complex, working, as it were, against their own nations or their middle-classes. Not only unrestricted immigrations, but it even seems encouraged immigration chaos and takings-over of even the northernmost hearts of Europe.

Whatever fuck up the Soviet Union was at least it somewhat maintained racial boundaries, and a glorious space race. And then a military-intelligence strongman appeared, schooled in KGB and how to ruin or construct societies, and of course he now goes for the eternal autarchic legacy and the 2.000 year old religion.

Meanwhile our purple-haired foul mouthed women are pushing & pulling as they can to get impregnated by brown babies, with help from our own states; and to prepare a massacre of the last few remaining whites in their homelands when they´ve become such a minority of whites that they won´t be able to withstand an ethnic conflict as seen in Africa.

Something in previous ages held these dhimmitude forces back.

And Islam is pushing forth because it´s a vital and total! worldview that subordinates the merest and driest economy to a totalitarian idea.

I ain´t saying we take up Distributionism.

But I´m saying: Gnon´s histiry says we need a total system to fight another total system.

At least we need to be elite and deploy a total system. A noble lie.

Since we already, most of us, are baptised into the Jewish god through the Bible, I suggest a veritable europeanism (anglo, teuton, christian, jewish, latin), against the brown horde scourge of the scourge.
(Of course the elite transcends the exoteric, as Strauss noted. Inside the Ottoman Empire, those followers of Zevi who had converted to Islam but who secretly continued Jewish observances and Brit Mila became known as the Dönme (Turkish: dönme “convert”)).

Looking at this matter will take many posts, and not wanting to clutter the comments here, I invite Dick Wagner and anyone to correspond with me at one of my blogs, or set up their own blog.

Call it Anarcho-Capitalist Leninism, or Maoist Libertarianism, or a synthesis of Dugin and Land. Simply, Dugin minus the anti-Capitalism & anti-West sentiment.

As if Dugin were the advisor to NATO, not to Putin.

As if Evola had subordinated Mussolini.

As if Hitler had done LSD & E.

& a Cyber-Crowley.



Apocalyptic Fantasies: Nick Land’s Horrorism

At the same time, I don´t see how Mr. Land is fully wrong. The Romans were brutal.

I read a book some years ago which was written by a former SS man who had joined the French Foreign legion after the war. His unit was deployed in Indochina, before the Korean War and before the Vietnam War. This was in the years after WW2 when the West´s conflicts with Communist guerrillas had started. “The Indochina Wars were a series of wars fought in Southeast Asia from 1946 until 1989, between communist Indochinese forces against mainly French, South Vietnamese, American, Cambodian, Laotian and Chinese forces.” These were 3 major Wars which includes more conflicts, apparently. This was a multi-decade Communist hot-zone.

The guerrillas were endlessly clever and savage. And adapted to the tropical (or whatever the formal name is) environment. Small, agile, with nothing to lose and everything to gain. The French regular forces couldn´t handle them. It took the SS-fueled Foreign Legion to actually be able to hold ground and advance in that situation. It took blue-eyed devilry.

It might take the same against ISIS. Adaptive morality wins wars, not—as it were—pure idealism.

The Spiritual Sun


This post was originally published on the now-defunct

In a post entitled “Islamic Vortex (Note-4)” Nick Land expressed his awe and deep academic admiration for ISIS style barbarism. This whole line of thought connects to Land’s theory of Abstract Horror, as articulated in another post entitled “Reactionary Horror”. Land here identifies two streams of reactionary thought, one (Traditionalism) being “mild and nostalgic”, and the other (Horrorism) being focused on “dissociating ‘the good’ and ‘the future’.” In both of these posts, Land uses the fictional character of Colonel Kurtz as a central metaphor for the Horrorism of the Dark Enlightenment. Kurtz, introduced by Joseph Conrad in “Heart of Darkness” and adapted by Coppola in “Apocalypse Now”, represents an “opportunity for an exploration of Hell.”

The whole Kurtz/Apocalypse Now analysis is based on a misconception: that the U.S.  lost the Vietnam War because a liberal democracy is incapable of using…

View original post 810 more words

Apocalyptic Fantasies: Nick Land’s Horrorism

muh mod

Loser Reply:Your comment is awaiting moderation.

Pseudo-males, with an ersatz spirit, complain about the Jews,
want “White solidarity” (a huge general class that´s never
going to be solid). muh (“White”) Nationalism, pretend
to be NRx. Chads, pseudo-alphas, mockers, jokers,
get stabbed, lose power, derided by the Muslim,
for the better. Vain white man, riteless, spite,
Twitter popus, can´t hold the streets down,
fantasists, mere bulles, to be slayed &
drained, of their blood for the gods.


muh mod

Magicians of the Outer Right

rhythm, rhythim*

The Mitrailleuse

It’s a common error to think that mystics and magicians are generally liberals or leftists. At least in America.

Most Boomer Americans, monolingual, insulated from the rest of the world and from history, associate “magick” with hippies, the “60s”, Tim Leary, pot and acid, and sexual freedom. When they think about it at all which isn’t often, these days. Most younger Americans don’t think about it at all, being too busy sexting, face booking and in other ways competing for visible status. Ritual, programmed self-hypnosis and other inner work are less common now, since they don’t yield outward signs of wealth or cool.

At least not right away.

I don’t know as much about Europe directly, but my impression is that there’s bit more attention to these subjects still, especially in Eastern Europe, and across the age groups. But as a rapidly shrinking population of young people plugs in, turns on…

View original post 812 more words

Magicians of the Outer Right