De Laddie

▬>”Now, (according to G) Trump’s a rogue bastion alpha who fought the “globalist Cathedral” alone against all odds.”

I have nowhere said this. I have always viewed Trump as a bit of a joke, it takes a joker to know one, so to speak. Can´t say he´s very subtle, but it works. He´s of course hired by the Deep State, like any other American main presidential candidate. 
 
Only the pre-approved get coverage by the so-called Mainstream Media. Not just anyone can become one of the two, red and blue, who attract the energies—fears and hopes—of the people, for the cathartic pseudo-democratic play & ploy, which is done to keep the tax-payers “happily” paying for the Military-Industrial Complex, feeling like they are “free”.
 
Our dear little Irish friend here, lost himself to wrath and fabrication, after I both questioned his purported Catholicism and a candidate (Trump) he had gotten hopeful about, the poor laddie. The Catholicism he only declared to me recently, he was a Hitlerist before that. I know, because I was once a Hitlerist too, and we discussed those things. In our discussions I seem to know more Catholic doctrine than him, surely an embarrassment for him, indeed in any case he seems to be unable to intellectually discuss it — as with anything really!, when pressed — he´ll get defensive, & passive aggressive or simply aggressive — opening himself up to being toyed with, like a kid bullied in school. 
 
I´ve never seen him refer to Jesus, and he states he is anti-clerical (after being pressed). I am rather sure he is just claiming to be Catholic now to appear more National & “Right-wing.” He is Irish after all. He can fool even himself.
 
 He contacted me 10 years ago, and he hasn´t really changed one bit since then. He´s still as dense and slow-moving, and prone to fabricate facts about his interests.
 
The difference between me and him, at least one difference, among many, is that I will readily admit any fabrication I have done as a joke or as hyperstition, while he will defend even disproven things—tooth and nail. And while I at times exaggerate to amuse myself and others, he does so seriously. Like, say, “Nobody likes you! :(“, “You have done nothing!”, “Everybody hates you!”, “You don´t know nothing!”, “No, it was you who said this!”. Le enfant, no?
 
Then he will defend his exaggerations, instead of lightly stating that they were but that for effect. Typical prole.
 
I include often figures in his life (his “psychological world”), because I find them, along with him, to be amusing characters, and y´all can see the effect it has on him. I often include him in e-mails I am sending to others, because I know it moves him.
 
I admit to having sympathy for him, and that I am also trying to shock him out of his psychological & intellectual inertia. The poor man is ridden by ideas he only understands at a surface level. He´s been sending me virtually the same e-mail for a decade, it´s like a spirit underneath crying for to be released from the gnomic mechanical responses from idées fixe that tie him to lesser forms. 
 
Usually, his answers are quite different if others are included, he is so embarrassed (often about nothing really) — as he has a communal soul — poor boy. But that is a part of my shock treatment. Do not think though, that I am ruining his soul. I assure you, it was beriddled before. I can only lead men to temptation, they will have to walk into it themselves.
 
Best it be said that I didn´t start this spat between us. As I remember it started years ago through an instant messenger application, wherein I asked him to not send me news of money Jews — then his pathos burst forth.  Apparently he´d been building up hopes and fears about me for some time — I had been leading a project I invited him to participate in before this, which he did OK in. Albeit quite passively. 
 
The funny thing is, that he´s living a double-life, of this pseudonymous Internet presence, so why is he so embarrassed? You would think I was living a double-life too, but I am not doing so. I am quite honest and open. In fact, hundreds know I have the interests I am known for, under my real name and person. People tell me things like I am the smartest person they know, to be honest and quite frank, if not self-congratulating.
 
Race, history, spirituality, philosophy, biology.
 
I´ve even mentioned the obscure Italian author a few times. 
 
“The Right-wing”, so-called, has been a bit of a joke, inadvertently or not, since losing horribly in WW2, and losing to Communists at that! So why not mess with an Irish dolt who is intellectually dense and stagnant, a liar, a thief, and a pseudonymous coward.
 
He sure as hell resented the fact that Skorzeny had worked for Israel, after WW2. He stated, like he knew it, that Skorzeny had been assassinated. He had no special knowledge of it.
 
Perhaps I will finally be inspired to collect the errors of his into one document. They are very amusing, especially his understanding of Evola´s concept of ‘riding the tiger’ (oooh!). 
Shortly said, the laddie has a tendency to replace fact with his hopes, or fears, as is common for the soul somewhere on the blurred field of proletarian-bourgeois psychology.
Last thing I remember, aside from this Trump fiasco, is  that he fabricated into Evola´s body of work, that the latter had “regretted”! his usage of drugs. I don´t recall Evola ever expressing any regrets. The laddie too, I informed of that Guénon had smoked cannabis, which he seemed to be unable, to integrate this fact, into his memory. I did this after he called me a pothead, which I would think would only apply if I´d smoke pot at least a few times a week, which I don´t. Normally potheads have a great effect on their daily life from the usage.
Worst thing is, the idiot he is, has been jealous of me for a long time. And parroting me. I´m fine with it. It can´t be good for his daily life though, but if it wasn´t me, it would be somebody else.
It only takes for me to use a term in an e-mail, for him to use it for the next couple of weeks. “Schizophrenic” is the latest one, altho I´m not sure he realizes that I was using it, the first time I used it in conversation with him, in the same way that Deleuze and Guattari use it, to mean, as it does, etymologically, ‘split-minded’.
Hopes and fears, boys, hopes and fears… it can split a man´s psyche into two.
And so the lower classes are ever ridden, easily manipulated or beaten down. They´ll grab at anything to describe what they feel they resent. Knowing this is what makes it so easy to play with them.
Don´t blame me.
22. When [the clever combatant] utilizes combined energy, his fighting men become as it were like unto rolling logs or stones. For it is the nature of a log or stone to remain motionless on level ground, and to move when on a slope; if four-cornered, to come to a standstill, but if round-shaped, to go rolling down.”
De Laddie

Buddhism is too anti-Cosmic for me

Lord Dontgivafokk

but it got pretty cool in Zen

based john 11

how so?

Lord Dontgivafokk

im the anti-Buddha

based john 11

it talks about infinite worlds, infinite beings

Lord Dontgivafokk

certainly

Lord Dontgivafokk

it has that

Sp00kalypse

White Scars are my thing

Sp00kalypse

vroom vroom. Fast attaq

Lord Dontgivafokk

Lord Dontgivafokk

in the grim dark future of Trumpianity there is only WAR

brainsturbator

and mechsuit maintenance is hella expensive

Lord Dontgivafokk

hahaha

Lord Dontgivafokk

john: Buddhism typically strives to kill off your connection to the world, you see this very well in that Gautama left his family

Lord Dontgivafokk

that´s why the hardcore buddhist typically live in monasteries

Lord Dontgivafokk

secluded, no families

Lord Dontgivafokk

the opposite of that is like Islam, where they got a number of wives and a dozen babies

Lord Dontgivafokk

i know its pop to hate on Islam, but they´re replacing us somewhat

Lord Dontgivafokk

i don´t care about Arabic, but their system works in that sense

Lord Dontgivafokk

japan made a synthesis of buddhism and expansion tho

Lord Dontgivafokk

but the got blown

Eric Patton▲☉♇

most esoteric traditions are built around isolating individuals from society

Eric Patton▲☉♇

see also: sufi mystics

Sp00kalypse

I don’t think it works that well. Saudi Arabia is bound to experience a sociocultural crissis at some point. They have all this power to acquire pleasure that are just flat out normal in the west, not even outright degenerate.

Lord Dontgivafokk

that´s Axis Age stuff

Eric Patton▲☉♇

big difference between normals and people who go the spiritual explorer route

Lord Dontgivafokk

there´s also esoterics who have families like in Rome before Christianity

Lord Dontgivafokk

and Germanics before Christianity

Eric Patton▲☉♇

Some modern schools are attempting to unite daily life with practice, but it’s a new thing considering how long esoteric traditions drag on

Sp00kalypse

That’s a huge task

Sp00kalypse

Human society is based on codependance for mundane needs

Eric Patton▲☉♇

the “isolate yourself from the world” angle is being taken out of schools over the long term though. But you don’t need to copy geopol of Islam to mget that.

Lord Dontgivafokk

the father was the priest of the family before Christianity divorced that role to wifeless “fathers”

Lord Dontgivafokk

emperor of rome was the pope of their religion

Sp00kalypse

Pharaos were living gods

Sp00kalypse

Demigods whatever

Lord Dontgivafokk

pontifex maximus, which the christian pope took as a title after the divorce of christianity from the empire

Sp00kalypse

Like the chinese emperors

Lord Dontgivafokk

right

Eric Patton▲☉♇

Kings also

Eric Patton▲☉♇

divine right

Lord Dontgivafokk

yes

Sp00kalypse

Yep

Lord Dontgivafokk

funny thing is, this gets restored in WarHammer 40.000

Sp00kalypse

In spite of the emprah’s wishes

Lord Dontgivafokk

we get a human (mainly white) empire with an imperial religion

Lord Dontgivafokk

where the church is a part of the empire, not outside of it like started happening in the west 1500 years ago

Lord Dontgivafokk

there happened a schizm, a dualism of powers that were previously united

Lord Dontgivafokk

which caused the modern schizophrenia of spirituality was something divorced from, as it were, daily life

Lord Dontgivafokk

schizophrenia means etymologically ‘split mindedness’

Lord Dontgivafokk

christianity has always been quite manichean

Eric Patton▲☉♇

king/emperor/pharoah was the midpoint between heaven and earthly affairs, more so than priests or astrologers

Lord Dontgivafokk

yeah

Lord Dontgivafokk

he was the high priest, above the mere priests

Lord Dontgivafokk

but also the chief warrior

Lord Dontgivafokk

& lawmaker

Sp00kalypse

So he was Warrior, poet and priest

Sp00kalypse

A full statesman

Sp00kalypse

Multiclass

Lord Dontgivafokk

right, but the priesthood got lost in the late roman empire

Lord Dontgivafokk

and then replaced by christian priests

Lord Dontgivafokk

who soon started vieing for power against the empire

Lord Dontgivafokk

so it was like a betrayal

Lord Dontgivafokk

the first schizm

Lord Dontgivafokk

then the church itself split

Lord Dontgivafokk

and split again

Lord Dontgivafokk

and again

Lord Dontgivafokk

and now we have 10.000.000 churches all saying they´re the right church of the world

Lord Dontgivafokk

it´s tracable via cladaistics

Lord Dontgivafokk

first there´s church of rome, which becomes catholicism, which splits into catholicism and orthodox, catholicism splits into catholicism and protestantism, orthodox splits into number of different orthodox, protestantism splits into this and that, which comes down to Jehovas, Mormons, and you know the rest

Lord Dontgivafokk

while in Rome, pagan Rome, there was simply one priesthood of the state

Sp00kalypse

The word became atomized

Lord Dontgivafokk

right

Sp00kalypse

And no longer with God…

Sp00kalypse

Interesting

Lord Dontgivafokk

right this all splits into trillion atheist branches

Lord Dontgivafokk

godless communists

Sp00kalypse

This is reminding me of the Tower of babel

Sp00kalypse

Powerful revelation

Sp00kalypse

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Lord Dontgivafokk

the utopianism starts with cults like gnostic cults

Lord Dontgivafokk

yeah

Lord Dontgivafokk

ein volk, ein reich, ein emperor!

Sp00kalypse

Kek

Sp00kalypse

Poast beakies

Lord Dontgivafokk
 lol

In general, it seems that true civilizations develop once Aryan, nomadic, “solar”, patriarchal, egalitarian, creative races meet with local, Chtonic, “lunar”, matriarchal, hierarchical races, as it did in India (with the local Dravidian element), in Europe (with the native Alpine and Etruscan elements) and even in China (with the Tocharians “fertilizing” the Chinese culture, brining them the horse and other innovations).

The Aryans have a high sense of organization, morality and of the rule of law, while the Chtonic races have more intuition, art of living and more connection to the earthy, practical side of life. Neither of the two types of races is perfect in itself. It is when they meet that we see brilliant civilizations appearing, it seems.

We notice for instance that when a culture is purely Aryan, there are no sculptures, sophisticated temples, big cities, etc. Only war and commercial trade (the British in the Modern Age are an example of this). The Aryan does not bother with embellishing his surrounding and settings things in stone. He’s always on the move.

When a culture is purely Chtonic on the other hand, then the whole society is based on social status, hierarchy, nepotism and there is little curiosity to expand one’s horizons, to learn from others or to evolve in any way (that’s how most of the world is). There is little space nor incentive for the development of new technologies. People live off the land, or steal from each other (as in the deserts of the Middle East).

When the Aryan element in a civilization gets diluted and fades away, the culture becomes stales and degenerates. Depending on the quality of the racial mixture, it can preserve itself in immobility virtually forever (like China) or it can decay into oblivion under the pressure of inferior blood (like the civilizations of the Middle East did).

The Sumerian, Assyrians, Persians, etc were at least partially Aryan, as per their language, their gods and social structure. Then they got overwhelmed by Semitic/Negroid blood (what we today call “Arab”) and disappeared.

Usually, their remaining Aryan elites moved out and immigrated into the next remaining civilization and bring with them their technical and spiritual knowledge (Babylonian elites moved into Egypt, then when Egypt was sinking, their elites moved into Greece, when Greece sank, their elites moved into Rome, etc.).

China also developed into a civilization once the seed of civilization was planted by small numbers of Aryan pioneers (Tocharians and others). And then they were smart enough to retain most of the useful things over the next thousands of years.

A modern day example of these phenomenon would be places like Hong Kong, Singapore or Taiwan, where once Aryan law (British Common Law) is implemented among a Chtonic race of good blood (ethnic Chinese) along with a tiny elite of Aryan managers/rulers/advisors, then that particular places flourishes. If you’d remove the Aryan element and Aryan laws, those places would in a few decades return to typical Chinese nepotism, corruption and top-down, hierarchical forms of organization.

▬▬▬ by Ahnenerbe @ https://forums.skadi.net/showthread.php?p=1200509#post1200509

 

(N) G. Eiríksson Says: Your comment is awaiting moderation.

As the self-reported Christians banally make fun of Mr. Land here, and by that act not imtating lord Jesus, I see that they advocate Distributionism.

Let´s be real. There´s never been a free as in fair market. Look at J.P. Morgan´s tricks, or that of any ‘robber baron’. Organized crime ruining organized labour or beating it. The Anglo-Semitic Complex, working, as it were, against their own nations or their middle-classes. Not only unrestricted immigrations, but it even seems encouraged immigration chaos and takings-over of even the northernmost hearts of Europe.

Whatever fuck up the Soviet Union was at least it somewhat maintained racial boundaries, and a glorious space race. And then a military-intelligence strongman appeared, schooled in KGB and how to ruin or construct societies, and of course he now goes for the eternal autarchic legacy and the 2.000 year old religion.

Meanwhile our purple-haired foul mouthed women are pushing & pulling as they can to get impregnated by brown babies, with help from our own states; and to prepare a massacre of the last few remaining whites in their homelands when they´ve become such a minority of whites that they won´t be able to withstand an ethnic conflict as seen in Africa.

Something in previous ages held these dhimmitude forces back.

And Islam is pushing forth because it´s a vital and total! worldview that subordinates the merest and driest economy to a totalitarian idea.

I ain´t saying we take up Distributionism.

But I´m saying: Gnon´s histiry says we need a total system to fight another total system.

At least we need to be elite and deploy a total system. A noble lie.

Since we already, most of us, are baptised into the Jewish god through the Bible, I suggest a veritable europeanism (anglo, teuton, christian, jewish, latin), against the brown horde scourge of the scourge.
(Of course the elite transcends the exoteric, as Strauss noted. Inside the Ottoman Empire, those followers of Zevi who had converted to Islam but who secretly continued Jewish observances and Brit Mila became known as the Dönme (Turkish: dönme “convert”)).

http://www.google.com/search?q=Frankism

Looking at this matter will take many posts, and not wanting to clutter the comments here, I invite Dick Wagner and anyone to correspond with me at one of my blogs, or set up their own blog.

Call it Anarcho-Capitalist Leninism, or Maoist Libertarianism, or a synthesis of Dugin and Land. Simply, Dugin minus the anti-Capitalism & anti-West sentiment.

As if Dugin were the advisor to NATO, not to Putin.

As if Evola had subordinated Mussolini.

As if Hitler had done LSD & E.

& a Cyber-Crowley.

Gnonery!

 

Apocalyptic Fantasies: Nick Land’s Horrorism

At the same time, I don´t see how Mr. Land is fully wrong. The Romans were brutal.

I read a book some years ago which was written by a former SS man who had joined the French Foreign legion after the war. His unit was deployed in Indochina, before the Korean War and before the Vietnam War. This was in the years after WW2 when the West´s conflicts with Communist guerrillas had started. “The Indochina Wars were a series of wars fought in Southeast Asia from 1946 until 1989, between communist Indochinese forces against mainly French, South Vietnamese, American, Cambodian, Laotian and Chinese forces.” These were 3 major Wars which includes more conflicts, apparently. This was a multi-decade Communist hot-zone.

The guerrillas were endlessly clever and savage. And adapted to the tropical (or whatever the formal name is) environment. Small, agile, with nothing to lose and everything to gain. The French regular forces couldn´t handle them. It took the SS-fueled Foreign Legion to actually be able to hold ground and advance in that situation. It took blue-eyed devilry.

It might take the same against ISIS. Adaptive morality wins wars, not—as it were—pure idealism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esprit_de_corps_(disambiguation)

The Spiritual Sun

rsz_bg-page

This post was originally published on the now-defunct Theden.tv.

In a post entitled “Islamic Vortex (Note-4)” Nick Land expressed his awe and deep academic admiration for ISIS style barbarism. This whole line of thought connects to Land’s theory of Abstract Horror, as articulated in another post entitled “Reactionary Horror”. Land here identifies two streams of reactionary thought, one (Traditionalism) being “mild and nostalgic”, and the other (Horrorism) being focused on “dissociating ‘the good’ and ‘the future’.” In both of these posts, Land uses the fictional character of Colonel Kurtz as a central metaphor for the Horrorism of the Dark Enlightenment. Kurtz, introduced by Joseph Conrad in “Heart of Darkness” and adapted by Coppola in “Apocalypse Now”, represents an “opportunity for an exploration of Hell.”

The whole Kurtz/Apocalypse Now analysis is based on a misconception: that the U.S.  lost the Vietnam War because a liberal democracy is incapable of using…

View original post 810 more words

Apocalyptic Fantasies: Nick Land’s Horrorism

muh mod

Loser Reply:Your comment is awaiting moderation.

Pseudo-males, with an ersatz spirit, complain about the Jews,
want “White solidarity” (a huge general class that´s never
going to be solid). muh (“White”) Nationalism, pretend
to be NRx. Chads, pseudo-alphas, mockers, jokers,
get stabbed, lose power, derided by the Muslim,
for the better. Vain white man, riteless, spite,
Twitter popus, can´t hold the streets down,
fantasists, mere bulles, to be slayed &
drained, of their blood for the gods.

 

muh mod